Photoshopped Philms: Demolition



Now that was probably the fastest and easiest Photoshopped Philms I’ve ever done and I just have to say how disappointed and bewildered I am at the sad state of film posters these days. If you’re unfamiliar with what the original Demolition poster looks like, it’s this:


How fucking lazy and uncreative is this poster? It has to be the worst film poster I ever saw. A square cut out and placed slightly skewed of Jake Gyllenhaal’s face. Braaaav-fucking-O! Whomever designed this deserves a fucking award. They probably spent a whole 20 minutes working on this. To put things into perspective, I spent over 3 hours on my Macaque Max: Furry Jungle poster. I painstakingly attempted to get the shading and color matching as perfect as I can get and it’s 10X better than what most film posters today look like. And that was for a Crom-damned goof! I mean couldn’t they make it look more like he was breaking down or blown-up. When I think demolition, I think a whole building being destroyed, not just carved like a piece of a kid’s ice cream cake. I know Jake Gyllenhaal is a good-looking fella and most people would rather want to see him in less pieces but for the sake of an interesting poster make it look like how he really feels. (note: I have not seen a trailer for this movie and I have no idea what it’s about. But judging by the poster the studio decided to present to us, I don’t give a hot shit to bother to check it out.) I took the liberty for this post to spend about 20 minutes in quickly making up a better poster for Demolition:


Again, I spent just a scant 20 minutes on photoshopping, what I feel is a more interesting poster. It’s far from perfect but give me more time and better resources and I can probably do better.

But I can’t single out Demolition’s poster alone. Whenever I walk in a multiplex’ lobby I am completely underwhelmed by the amount of creativity and craft that goes into designing these movie posters. Is it just because photoshop makes things easier and thus movie studios are taking the lazy and cheaper route to market these flicks? Even crappy schlocky movies from the 70s and 80s had at least great posters or artwork to market their movies. Sometimes that was the only good thing going for the movie. Look at the poster for R.O.T.O.R.:


Sure it may be one of our favorite movies on this site but we won’t deny it’s a completely shitty movie but that poster makes it look fucking epic. I have that poster hanging in my basement it’s so badass. They put more effort into making that beautiful and awesome illustration (of a robot that doesn’t even look like that in the movie) than they did in the actual movie itself. I wish I could find out how many people thought that R.O.T.O.R. was going to be this spectacular flick after they saw that poster. Probably everyone and I don’t blame them.

Now I’m not saying every poster needs to be Drew Struzan level great but at least put some more creativity into the poster. In a way, I’m not too surprised that the posters have taken a the dip lately because everything in media has. I’ve complained ad nauseum about the quality of filmmaking on this site whether it’s weak screenwriting, film scores or unfunny comedies but I even think today’s music is paltry and lackluster compared to older music. And before you say, “Well every generation thinks what they grew up with is better than the future stuff!” Let me assure you that I was born in the late 70s and grew up on 80s and 90s and I still think the 60s and 70s were the pinnacle of creative filmmaking and music, hands down. I didn’t grow up with anything earlier than 1976 and if I were to compare media from today to anything in the 60s-70s-80s I cannot really give much credit to today’s standard of creative writing and art. Not even a little bit. I don’t care if you blame technology or lack of vision, today’s stuff is not as good. Now maybe these things go in waves—perhaps in the next few decades we’ll have a creative renaissance and I sure hope so because I’m getting incredibly bored and pissed at the state of these things.

But seriously, is it too much to ask to make things nicer, wittier or graphic? Enough of the lame ass photoshopped heads crowding a movie poster. OK? We get it. With all these amazing special effect-laden super-hero flicks that came out of creative sources called “Graphic Novels” you’d think the movie posters would be equally as awesome and impressive as the movie. Here’s the poster for the blockbuster The Avengers:


Dull and unimaginative as well as just a simple photoshop. And here’s a fan-made poster I found on the internet:


I’m not saying it’s genius but when placed side-by-side which one catches your eye more? What one looks like it was made with more sincerity and heart? Which one would you rather hang on your parents’ basement dorm room? Why isn’t Marvel, who’s practically printing their own money at this point, utilizing more artists and illustrators that would benefit and be most appropriate in this medium of movie posters? It’s sad and mind-boggling. 

Sorry if I strive for more pizzazz in my art, music and films. I think we can all do better. We deserve it with all the technology at our disposal. Everyone is walking around with cameras and apps that can basically do anything creative and instead it’s all useless and pointless drivel. Seems everyone has all the tools but not enough of the talent. Not everyone can be creative I know but when we trust that filmmakers and musicians are supposed to be the professional artists that they say they are and we end up with inferior product after inferior product, somethings just not right.

3 thoughts on “Photoshopped Philms: Demolition

  1. I want Drew Struzan to do every movie poster! And I admit that the R.O.T.O.R. poster is awesome. A really great poster can definitely convince me to watch a movie. But not nowadays as, like you say, the posters all suck now. I think you’re looking at this the wrong way around, though – I think there are still plenty of talented people in the world (I love looking at fan-created movie posters online!) but fewer & fewer people in the general public give a shit about art & creativity so those with talent get no support. We live in a Kardashian-obsessed world. Look at all the stupid crap people post on social media & look at the shitty movies that people flock to. It’s Idiocracy come true. There was probably a better poster for Demolition but the studio execs (or whoever decides these things) will have rejected it as they think that the majority of the public need things as simple & as spelled-out as possible. And the studio execs are unfortunately totally right. Yours wouldn’t be accepted as the actor’s face is distorted so no one would realize who’s in the movie as they don’t want to actually have to READ the poster. We’re just in the minority, dude. When I did a couple of posts about Drew Struzan, hardly any movie bloggers here had even heard of him and the majority that I follow have quite a bit of knowledge about films (which is why I follow them). So you can guarantee that the general moviegoing public don’t give a shit about a movie’s poster. Hell, they don’t even give a shit if the movie is actually any good! They’re usually messing around on their phones through the whole movie anyway. Hey – it’s been ages since I left a long comment here but, screw it, you seemed in the mood for a discussion. Sorry! 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    • Please! Don’t apologize! It’s too bad Drew is retired. They had to coax him out to do one of the new Star Wars ones just to appease the geeks. But I agree with you wholeheartedly. But I don’t think I’m looking it too much the wrong way because I said “but when we trust that filmmakers and musicians are supposed to be the professional artists that they say they are and we end up with inferior product after inferior product, somethings just not right.” Like we’re the paying public whose supposed to be entertained and enticed by these so-called professional artists. I call them as I see them and they are hacks. I don’t doubt that there’s a lot of talented people but why or how are they not in the vanguard of the industry? It used to be that way eons ago. Somewhere in time the illustrator of that R.O.T.O.R. was hired by a studio chief to make that poster and it looks fantastic. Regardless of how much he was paid (which was probably peanuts) or how much work he actually got overall (probably not much) but the right guy was chosen for the right project to make a pitch-perfect poster for a shitty movie. Why doesn’t that happen anymore? I’m hard-pressed to think of the last impressive movie poster I liked from a studio. And I forgot to mention that not even the font on the Demolition poster was interesting. It was basically Helvetica. Not even any thought went into that.

      There’s a lot of people out there being called “artists” “innovators” and “geniuses” that can barely hold a candle to the classics but again, these Kardashian-obsessed people either don’t care or don’t even realize what better music or movies or TV has been created. But that’s what’s so frustrating is that people, like you said, “don’t give a shit about a movie’s poster.” If this is the way things are heading then fuck.

      But it’s not supposed to go that way anyway. The common folk ain’t supposed to tell the artists and talented people what is creative, it’s supposed to be the other way around. The artists and the designers are the ones who are in charge to impress and inspire us, the general public. It’s like we live in an ass-backwards society when it comes to the arts.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Ha! We sound like old people! 😉 I do hope things turn around at some point and it’s just this generation that sucks for whatever reason but it feels like every decade gets worse. It feels like movies, music, etc nowadays are all aimed mainly at twentysomethings, which is ridiculous as they don’t pay for anything anyway – they illegally download everything. But then again, as far as movies are concerned, I think the last couple of years have been an improvement & there have been some really good ones (although the posters were still boring). But it’s not like I could go into work & mention something like Ex Machina to co-workers – even though it did pretty well & got recognition and movie bloggers loved it, I don’t know one damn person in my “real life” who will have watched it other than me & the hubby. I think the studios just know there’s no money to be made from making something creative anymore so they usually don’t bother. It’s true, though – I constantly get frustrated when, in order to see something interesting & not totally mainstream, I’d have to travel into London as that’s the only place showing those kinds of films. When they do show the more obscure ones at my local cinema, they’re shown on these tiny screens that seat about 30 people and the hubby & I are usually two of ten people or less. And we’re quite often the youngest, which is pretty damn scary! So I still mostly blame the general public for not supporting the arts but also blame the “money men” behind the scenes of today’s movies & music as they’re the ones who get final say on what will get made and how even though they don’t know a damn thing about art. It IS totally ass-backwards, like you say! The general public demands braindead, inferior movies these days so that’s what the studios give them. Same with movie posters. These damn whippersnappers! They’re ruining it for us all!! 😉


Got something to say?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s